Filed under: made me think, people I like, service design | Tags: conference, fergus bisset, forum, joel bailey, service design network
At this very moment Service Designers from all over the world are voting, debating and discussing. Joel Bailey has set up a forum to capture the online conversation about next years Service Design Network Conference.

The location of the event, accessibility and content are the main thread of chatter. The way our online community lives and breathes is something that has been on my mind alot lately. Particularly, as it was one of the main influences of MakingServiceSense and the reality that things are changing, the landscape is shifting at such a dramatic pace.
Here is a snapshot of a very insightful chat Fergus Bisset and I had about this very topic…
“What of that value our networks provide? Beyond the obvious pleasure that sharing links, drinks and thoughts provide, or the joys of discoursing with like minded individuals? How are we formalising the value that each of us takes away from these interactions? How is it guiding our autonomous activities, how is it intertwining itself with our ‘personal’ thoughts, dreams and ambitions? As Shirky, Leadbetter and many others have highlighted, social connectivity can be such a powerful driver and influencer how can we be sure we’re heading in the right direction?”

I think this is brilliant and a definite leap in the right direction. Hopefully, the network is listening to this conversation – the overriding message to you is ‘practice what you preach’…
5 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>










A few years ago I was asked to organise an event for academics in art and design to get together to discuss widening participation. I’d been to a few such gatherings and they quickly began to annoy me (I know, it’s hard to believe!)
The reason being that you always saw the same people there, everyone had a jolly good time, clapped the keynote speaker, who they all either knew or wanted to hobnob with (some more nobby than hobby), had a big dinner and got drunk enough that there’d be something to laugh about next time, then everyone would go home until the next “jolly”.
At every event there’d always be a few new faces but they were like people who’d been invited to someone’s party by a friend, but then the friend didn’t show up. We never saw them again.
Networks are great – until they become impenetrable. It’s a thin line between network and clique.
When I had my turn to organise the events I deliberately worded the first invite in such a way that if the person receiving it were a Dean or head of department, they were to nominate someone else to go – someone who’d never been to one perhaps. And I deliberately sent invitations to people whose names I’d noticed popping up on email lists etc but who I’d never seen at one of the events.
And for speakers, I targetted people doing interesting work who’d never spoken about it, young academics, people just finishing their PhDs and (shock horror!) the NUS.
It was a really good event that resulted in a widening of the network. There were enough “old hands” there that there wasn’t a splintering of the network, and people actually learnt something because they were hearing from people they’d never heard from before.
Design conferences are often like that. Lots of people who know each other already gathering to gossip and preen. And keynote talks from some famous designer just showing off a slideshow of their latest work. Yawn.
So basically what I’m trying to say is “amen” to the above. Don’t let service design go down that route. Use an event to welcome new people, to listen to stories from the new agencies and individuals, or even the people who benefit from service design. Invite non-designers, potential service design users, and use the event as a knowledge transfer, mentoring and education event. And get the heads of the well-known companies to send their latest recruit along. And if there’s a charge for attending, add a small amount to it that can be used to fund someone who can’t afford the travel or accommodation. Welcome students – let them in for free and give them a platform.
That way it becomes a listening and sharing event rather than a show and tell.
Or to put it briefly: Make the network a service.
:)
Comment by Jonathan Baldwin November 5, 2009 @ 9:12 amI couldn’t agree more!
I think it would be a good idea to make better use of the creative capabilities of our network. We are so blessed with all the talent. And, this is the main issue, we should keep having conversations like this in the open.
If we talk we grow, learn, create a feeling of co-ownership (you know… that stuff we tell our clients and students).
We should not be afraid to talk. I refuse to do so!! We have discussions because we care about the network. If we stopped discussing, we stopped caring.
And its an energy we should not squander!!!
We need to eat our own dog food!!
Let us be the best example of how Service design can make a difference and ad real value. And let’s keep learning from this journey. It would be so much fun to try!
Let’s do something exceptional!
Comment by Arne van Oosterom November 5, 2009 @ 12:07 pmAmen to the above comments
On a realistic note then, let’s hold the conference in an easy to get to destination…er London…or somewhere in Europe that isn’t an island and too expensive for a student to travel to, or off putting for people on tight budgets…let’s have it somewhere accessible!
We should be learning from students and new graduates, and other ‘non design’ disciplines to look at service design evolving, not becoming stagnant and labeled.
The introduction of more participatory workshops at these kind of events could potentially work really well and because attendees would have to work together, conversations would have to start, new ideas would form and importantly, new connections between disciplines and backgrounds that perhaps would never have met would take place. This would be a move in the direction of an evolution of what the current discipline is and can achieve.
Let’s work together and practice what we preach!
Comment by sarahdrummond November 5, 2009 @ 12:21 pmIt’s great that a discussion is now underway.
I don’t really mind where the Conference is, but I think it should be easily accessible – and that means by ONE flight (or train journey) from most international locations. This brings to mind places like London, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Paris, Berlin… all the big hubs.
As soon as a second flight is involved (and remember, a lot of folks will already have a two-leg flight, so that “second” flight might be a third), it gets a lot more expensive to get there, in terms of cash, time, and environmental load.
We are a young discipline. Easy access is crucial.
Later on, when inspiration dries up, we can think about fun, quirky, stimulating locations. But right now the people are all the stimulus we need. We need to find the simplest way to get them all under one roof.
(Crossposted from Wenkowski)
Comment by Adam Lawrence November 5, 2009 @ 2:35 pmEr, Wenowski, sorry.
Comment by Adam Lawrence November 5, 2009 @ 2:38 pm